Question:
Which draft pick will the Washington Redskins end up with in 2010 and who should they pick?
2010-01-02 09:58:17 UTC
The Redskins need a quarterback AND an offensive line but who do you think we will draft and with what pick will we have to be able to draft them with? I'm hearing Sam Bradford or Jimmy Claussen right now
Ten answers:
Cheston
2010-01-03 18:35:52 UTC
The Redskins should have either the 4th or 5th pick in the draft. It all depends on who has the stronger schedule, the Chiefs or the Redskins. As of last week the Redskins had the 6th so thats what my mock draft is based off of. http://www.livingonsports.com/2010-nfl-mock-draft.html



But that being said I do not believe that the Redskins should or will get a QB. It is not their highest need. Campbell has done fine, and the fact is that even Peyton Manning can't win with that offensive line so there is no sense in getting a mediocre player in Clausen or Bradford.
Junior
2010-01-02 10:54:17 UTC
No... the top three quarterbacks going this year will be Bradford, Clausen and Mallett... not Pike, not McCoy, not Tebow, not anyone else.



I really think that the Skins will draft Bradford at 5 or 6. It's kind of a bad year for us because Campbell is might be a free agent, so we really need a quarterback, but more importantly, we need a new offensive line with replacements at pretty much every line position. Dockery could probably still start for us, and maybe Rabach can keep playing at center, but we'd be better off without him.



Especially if Mike Shanahan comes on board, he'll want a franchise quarterback to work with.



There are some decent linemen that will be free agents this coming year (with CBA), hopefully a guy like Marcus McNeill won't get re-signed for some reason by the Chargers (they also have to pay Vincent Jackson, Sproles, etc.) But Campbell is basically the best free agent quarterback out there.
?
2010-01-02 10:53:50 UTC
The Redskins will end with about the fifth or so pick. Despite what that WaterFootball.com post says (sorry but I hate that site and their bogus predictions like Mallet in the 1st round), I think the draft should shake out something like this:



(1) Rams - Ndamukong Suh [no QB's in this draft are worth the #1 pick]

(2) Lions - Gerald McCoy

(3) Chiefs - Russell Okung or Rolando McClain [so many holes on the team]

(4) Bucs - Eric Berry



With the fifth pick I think the Skins should take a tackle (Okung, Davis, etc.) but they won't. Snyder will want a big time QB which means Sam Bradford or Jimmy Clausen, probably Bradford. I don't think Jimmy is even worth a mid-1st round pick. I mean look at the hype Brady Quinn had out of Notre Dame and Jimmy doesn't even have that hype.
P E
2010-01-02 10:17:29 UTC
Are you sure you heard Bradford and Claussen? In a draft class full of quarterbacks, and with the Redskins getting a fairly high draft pick (the 6th pick is my estimate), it seems those two may be the worst quarterbacks of the lot. I think the Redskins may try to draft McCoy, Tebow, or Pike (though Pike shot the wad in the Sugar Bowl) with an early pick and offensive line/running backs with remaining picks. A good strategy would be to unload Cooley or Fred Davis for a second rounder, drafting an additional offensive lineman or running back (or an upper-tier quarterback if available). I know no one is thrilled about Snyder's free agency spending, but offensive line may be the position to address in free agency this year, as well as through the later rounds of the draft.



After seeing Mallet's game today against ECU, I'd hardly say he will be even entering the draft this year. Sam Bradford would be a big mistake - injuries and surgeries hopefully improve his arm, but his lack of durability and the unknown effects of his rehabilitation make him a risky prospect, leaving Pike, Tebow, and McCoy as top QB prospects. However, this is admittedly all opinion and hearsay at the moment as the top prospects will not be clarified until after the NFL combine.
JAMMER
2010-01-04 13:20:27 UTC
We have the 4th pick and hopefully we don't waste it on a QB. I am hoping they take the best available player. It would be nice to even trade up to get Suh but if not maybe we can get Eric Berry. I know we need help on the O line but Suh and Berry are by far the best players in the draft. As far as Bradford or Clausen do I need remind everyone of Heath "where am I" Shuler?
2010-01-02 10:09:01 UTC
1 St. Louis Rams: Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame

If the Rams hold on to the No. 1 pick, there's going to be a heated debate until they agree to terms with Jimmy Clausen a few days before the 2010 NFL Draft: Should St. Louis go with Clausen or Ndamukong Suh?



It's deja vu all over again. Two years ago, people argued Glenn Dorsey over Matt Ryan. Last year, many believed that the Lions would choose Aaron Curry or Jason Smith over Matthew Stafford. Ultimately, the Falcons and Lions made the right decision.



This is pretty much a no-brainer. Unless the Rams acquire Jason Campbell or someone else via free agency, there's no way they can pass up on a franchise quarterback. New regimes mean new quarterbacks. Last year Steve Spagnuolo and Billy Devaney flirted with the possibility of taking Mark Sanchez, but ultimately couldn't because of Mark Bulger's contract. However, this season they can get rid of Bulger and finally obtain "their guy."



Jimmy Clausen is unquestionably the top quarterback prospect in this draft. He threw for 28 touchdowns and only four picks on an 8.8 YPA and a 68.0 completion percentage this year. He's superior to Sam Bradford because he has a bigger arm and has spent three years in a West Coast offense. Bradford, on the other hand, is coming out of a shotgun spread offense and just had shoulder surgery. His arm strength is also very questionable. Clausen is a much better fit for St. Louis' offense than Bradford is.



For more, check out why Jimmy Clausen the best NFL-ready junior quarterback in NFL Draft history.









2 Detroit Lions: Ndamukong Suh, DT, Nebraska

I still say this pick should be Russell Okung - even over Ndamukong Suh. To win in this league, you need to (in order): have a quarterback, protect your quarterback and get to the other quarterback. Detroit cannot do the second thing on that list. Last year, I berated the Lions for not drafting Michael Oher or William Beatty, so I can't say I'm surprised that Matthew Stafford suffered an injury. Beatty has shown some promise with the Giants, while Oher has been prolific at both left and right tackle this year.



Unfortunately for Detroit fans, the team still likes Jeff Backus, even though he has allowed eight sacks this year. Offensive line coach George Yarno recently praised Backus:



"I think he's at the very top of his game right now. He's obviously got a lot of experience. He really does a good job of knowing what he can and can't do and what (defenses) are going to try to do to him. He has done a tremendous job for us this year. I think he's very comparable to some of the upper-echelon tackles in this league."



It's always been painfully obvious that the Lions are clueless, but this quote pretty much cements it. Apparently, Backus will remain Matthew Stafford's blindside "protector" for at least another year.



Suh is a great consolation prize and will help Detroit's woeful defense, but Stafford will continue to get banged around until the Lions find a legitimate left tackle.





3 Kansas City Chiefs: Russell Okung, OT, Oklahoma State

When the Chiefs selected Tyson Jackson over Aaron Curry in the 2009 NFL Draft, it showed me that Scott Pioli favors positional value over talent. If he follows this principle again, he'll take Russell Okung over Eric Berry if both options are available to him.



Left tackle is a huge need because Pioli must protect his $63 million investment in Matt Cassel. In 13 games, Branden Albert has surrendered nine sacks and has been whistled for 10 penalties. Pioli didn't draft Albert, and the Chiefs organization doesn't have that much money invested into him (about $3 million over the next four years).



Pioli can afford to draft a franchise left tackle and move Albert around in an effort to give Matt Cassel more time in the pocket. He needs to protect his investment - no matter how bad it may be.





4 Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Gerald McCoy, DT, Oklahoma

Man, the Buccaneers must not want to draft a talented player. You can play the Seahawks and Saints close, but at least lose at the end so you can get a chance at Ndamukong Suh. Fail.



Though Suh is off the board, the Buccaneers still go defensive tackle. Gerald McCoy isn't as great of a fit for Tampa Bay's defense as Suh would have been, but he would still be an enormous upgrade for their pedestrian defensive line.



By the way, if you're a Bucs fan, make sure you check out Pewter Report.com. It's the ultimate source for inside news on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, including all of the draft prospects they're targeting.











5 Washington Redskins: Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma

A couple of weeks ago, it appeared as though Daniel Snyder would have a tough choice to make regarding Jason Campbell, who played out of his mind against the likes of New Orleans, Philadelphia and Dallas (the first time). However, everything has quickly unraveled in the past two weeks.



If a new CBA isn't reached, Campbell will
West
2010-01-04 12:06:15 UTC
idk why alot of people hate jason campbell i have been to games and watch him get hes *** kicked becouse the o-line if u look at how good he did vs the saints where he didnt get sacked and had time to throw the ball he was amazing no matter what qb u bring to the skins it will be the same **** as it was with campbell with no o line it dont matter if u had tom brady back there he would be getting beat up to, so i thank we keep campbell and get a o-line and a few good corners, b4 people start hating on campbell they need to know about football without time to throw the ball u wont be ****, this mock draft stuff i wouldnt listion to right now intell they know if there keepin campbell or not but if they dont i would like to see them get colt from texas sam bradford alot of people want but if hes hurting now just wait intell he comes to dc with no o-line then he wont be able to walk, i say keep cambell becouse when u give him time he can be just as better as any other qb in the league
2010-01-02 18:32:47 UTC
At least in the top 10. I think they will draft Sam Bradford or Jimmy Clausen
devilishblueyes
2010-01-02 10:13:34 UTC
If I was the Redskins, I'd focus on a quarterback first and foremost. They kept Campbell once before and it didn't pan out. I don't think they'll make that mistake again. Both of those choices sound good although the choice for quarterback might surprise a little.
Daddy
2010-01-02 10:02:32 UTC
sportscenter guys said they will try to pick sam bradford or ndamukong suh....i forgot which one though


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...