The best team in the SEC has consistently been better than the best team from other conferences. This is a matter of fact as the BCS Champion has come from the SEC for the last 5 seasons and, most likely, this season as well. It cannot be disputed by a rational, mature, objective individual.
You list 6 weak teams from the conference and somehow fail to mention Georgia. Georgia has proven over the last 10 - 20 years to be pretty much of a cupcake. That you missed this is an indicator that you aren't a student of the game and you're just an anti-SEC agitator. No problem there. We can't all be smart. Anyway, by your own analysis there are 6 or perhaps 7 "cupcakes" in the conference. That leaves 5 or 6 teams, not counting A&M and Missouri, that contend for BCS bowls consistentely year after year after year after year. Name another league that has 5 or 6 teams that consistently compete for BCS bowls. You can't. Don't bother trying. The 5 recent BCS championships have gone to four different schools. Other conferences don't come close to that level of depth.
I cannot discuss the possibility of how two teams from the same conference may play in a National Title game without referencing polls. Again, you show a tremendous lack of understanding in regards to the subject of college football. The polls are a driving factor in the rankings and the rankings are the sole determining factor in which teams play in the BCS bowls. It is not possible to discuss the BCS rankings without discussing the polls. My 3 year old daughter understands this. That you don't calls into question your intelligence and your manhood.
Your suspicion that ESPN's reporting somehow influences polls and therefore BCS bowls is yet another indicator of your ignorance or stupidity. Why is it that you seem to be able to shrug of this influence yet you are convinced that the pollsters cannot remain unswayed? Do you really think that you have that much more intellectual integrity than every pollster? Do you really believe that you're the only human on the planet that can ignore the far reaching, sweeping influence of the evil empire that is ESPN? I find this hard to believe and conclude that you're an ignorant buffoon living in a world of delusion rather than fact.
Consider this: SEC schools are generally in the southern region of the United States. The weather in SEC territory is generally favorable compared to the weather in other regions. This allows for more year round participation in all sports. This results in the development of bigger, faster, stronger high school athletes. Better athletes combined with better coaches combined with a highly engaged fan base combined with massive sport budgets at member institutions leads to SEC success on the football field.
Finally, let's address SEC out of conference scheduling. The SEC has proven that scheduling weak out of conference opponents does not result in poor BCS rankings as long as the conference schedule remains strong. It has been shown time and again that out of conference scheduling is not a major factor as long as the conference schedule is sufficiently strong. Knowing this to be true and still scheduling a tough out of conference schedule is incredibly stupid. Why LSU did it this year is anybody's guess but it certainly worked out for them. Which would you rather be? Oregon with a tough out of conference schedule and no chance of competing for the BCS title or Alabama with a weak out of conference schedule and a very high likelihood of participating in the title game? If your favorite school or favorite conference is too stupid or too weak to take advantage of this type of scheduling you should blame the people in charge of that school or conference. Don't blame ESPN, the SEC, the polls, or anything else. That's a tactic of the weak willed and simple minded.
Point proven. I win. You lose.