Hello, Im a Univ of cincinnati bearcat football fan, and a graduate of the school.. this team is and has been ranked 5th for awhile... the issue is and has been for many years ( for many teams/schools) too rate these teams based on BCS ratings? for all of the previous teams, schools, fans, this has been the most frustrating issue for collegiate football teams as everyone feels that theyre should be a playoff system to replace the BCS rating system... we all know that smaller schools such as boise state, the university of cincinnati will never move up to the top 3 or 1 or 2 as the BCS favors and wants the larger schools to be on top too generate the most revenues..... this system came under scrutiny more than ever when last year we all wanted a playoff game for florida, oklahoma, alabama.. and why not? why not have a playoffs system for tthe top teams as we all have our favorite teams thatt are stuck in say 3rd or 4th or 2nd and they will not move up based on ratings..... do you agree that those smaller schools that do not generate the same revenues and have smaller followings ie. fan base etc. cannot surpass the bigger schools that are ranked higher but with the same number of wins/losses? your input is appreciated!
ps. if you have an opinion on the UC bearcats whom are currently 5th in the bcs standings/ap polls and their ranking in relation too other teams, i would appreciate it...